banner



Home  ›  How Do Camera Traps Produce Data

How Do Camera Traps Produce Data

Written By Friday 29 April 2022 Add Comment Edit

A reddish light camera (short for red light running camera [1]) is a type of traffic enforcement photographic camera that photographs a vehicle that has entered an intersection after the traffic bespeak controlling the intersection has turned reddish.[2] Past automatically photographing vehicles that run red lights, the photo is testify that assists regime in their enforcement of traffic laws.[3] [4] Generally the camera is triggered when a vehicle enters the intersection (passes the stop-bar) after the traffic signal has turned ruby.

Typically, a police force enforcement official volition review the photographic testify and make up one's mind whether a violation occurred. A citation is then usually mailed to the owner of the vehicle institute to be in violation of the law.[5] These cameras are used worldwide, in Prc, in European countries, and in countries including: Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Indonesia, the Britain, Singapore and the United States.[vi] [7] More than 75 countries worldwide apply red low-cal cameras.[8]

If a proper identification of the driver cannot exist made, instead of a ticket, some police departments send out a notice of violation to the owner of the vehicle, requesting identifying information so that a ticket may be issued later.

According to the Insurance Plant for Highway Safety, ruby-red-light running is a frequent cause of crashes, with 6,000 people killed betwixt 1992 and 1998, 850 each twelvemonth in the Usa alone, while i.four million were injured. In Commonwealth of australia, 15% to 21% of the crashes at signalized intersections were related to red calorie-free running during 1994–1998.[9]

There is debate and ongoing research nigh the use of red calorie-free cameras. Authorities cite public safety as the chief reason that the cameras are installed,[x] [xi] [12] while opponents contend their use is more for financial proceeds.[13] [fourteen] There have been concerns that cherry-red light cameras scare drivers (who want to avert a ticket) into more sudden stops,[15] [sixteen] which may increase the run a risk of rear-end collisions. The elevated incentive to terminate may mitigate side collisions. Some traffic signals take an all crimson duration, allowing a grace period of a few seconds before the cross-management turns green. Some studies have confirmed more rear-cease collisions where red light cameras have been used, while side collisions decreased, but the overall collision rate has been mixed. A systematic review summarized evidence from 38 studies and plant that overall, ruby-low-cal cameras are effective at reducing right bending crashes and related injuries, besides as total injuries, only they also lead to an increment in rear end crashes.[17] In some areas, the length of the yellowish stage has been increased to provide a longer alert to accompany the red-calorie-free-running-camera. There is as well business organization that the international standard formula used for setting the length of the yellow stage ignores the laws of physics, which may cause drivers to inadvertently run the red stage.[xviii]

History [edit]

Ruby-red low-cal cameras were first developed in holland by Gatso.[19] Worldwide, ruby low-cal cameras have been in utilise since the 1960s, and were used for traffic enforcement in Israel as early as 1969.[iii] The kickoff cherry-red light photographic camera system was introduced in 1965, using tubes stretched across the route to detect the violation and subsequently trigger the photographic camera. One of the commencement developers of these red calorie-free camera systems was Gatsometer BV.[nineteen]

The cameras showtime received serious attention in the The states in the 1980s post-obit a highly publicized crash in 1982, involving a ruby-low-cal runner who collided with an eighteen-month-sometime girl in a stroller (or "button-chair") in New York Urban center. Later on, a community group worked with the city's Department of Transportation to inquiry automatic police force-enforcement systems to identify and ticket drivers who run ruby-red lights. New York'south red-light camera program went into effect in 1993.[twenty] From the 1980s onward, crimson light camera usage expanded worldwide, and one of the early camera system developers, Poltech International, supplied Commonwealth of australia, Britain, Southward Africa, Taiwan, the Netherlands and Hong Kong.[21] American Traffic Systems (subsequently American Traffic Solutions) (ATS) and Redflex Traffic Systems emerged as the primary suppliers of cherry light camera systems in the Us,[22] while Jenoptik became the leading provider of crimson light cameras worldwide.[23]

Initially, all scarlet light camera systems used movie, which was delivered to local law enforcement departments for review and approval.[24] [25] The showtime digital camera system was introduced in Canberra in December 2000,[21] and digital cameras take increasingly replaced the older picture show cameras in other locations since and then.[25]

Operation [edit]

Crimson light cameras are typically installed in protective metal boxes attached to poles[26] at intersections,[10] which are often specifically chosen due to high numbers of crashes and/or carmine-light-running violations.[25] In some instance, cameras are built into traffic lights. Cherry light camera systems typically employ a sensor that detects the presence of a vehicle past the end bar, and, in some cases, measures the speed of a vehicle at the time it ran the cherry-red lite. The sensors may be single or dual anterior loops, piezoelectric strips, laser, radar or optical video analyses. Using the speed measured, the system predicts if a particular vehicle will non be able to stop before entering the intersection. In some instances the organization takes ii or more photographs.[27] The first photo shows the vehicle just before it enters the intersection, with the light showing crimson, and the second photo, taken a second or ii subsequently, shows the vehicle when it is in the intersection.[28]

Details that may exist recorded past the camera organisation (and after presented to the vehicle owner) include: the engagement and time, the location, the vehicle speed, the amount of time elapsed since the light turned red, and the corporeality of fourth dimension elapsed since the light turned yellow and the vehicle passed into the intersection. The event is captured as a serial of photographs or a video clip, or both, depending on the technology used, which shows the vehicle before it enters the intersection on a cherry-red light signal and its progress through the intersection.[10] The information and images, whether digital or adult from moving picture, are sent to the relevant law enforcement agency. There, the data is typically reviewed by a law enforcement official or police department clerk,[29] who determines if a violation occurred and, if so, approves issuing a citation to the vehicle owner,[ten] who may claiming the citation.[5]

Studies take shown that 38% of violations occur inside 0.25 seconds of the lite turning ruby and 79% within one 2d. A few red light photographic camera systems let a grace catamenia of upwardly to half a 2nd for drivers who pass through the intersection just as the low-cal turns red.[ii] Ohio and Georgia introduced a statute requiring that one second be added to the standard yellow time of whatsoever intersection that has a red lite photographic camera, which has led to an 80% reduction in tickets since its introduction. New Bailiwick of jersey has the strictest yellow timing provisions in the state every bit a issue of concerns that cameras would exist used to generate acquirement; they have a statute specifying that the yellowish time for an intersection that has a red light camera must be based on the speed at which 85% of the road's traffic moves rather than be based on the road's actual speed limit.

Usage [edit]

Carmine light camera usage is widespread in a number of countries worldwide.[half dozen] [30] Netherlands-based Gatso presented red light cameras to the market in 1965,[xix] and red light cameras were used for traffic enforcement in Israel every bit early on as 1969.[3] In the early 1970s, red lite cameras were used for traffic enforcement in at least i jurisdiction in Europe.[iii] Australia began to use them on a wide scale in the 1980s.[7] [31] As of July 21, 2010[update], expansion of red light camera usage in Australia is ongoing.[32] In some areas of Commonwealth of australia, where the red low-cal cameras are used, at that place is an online organisation to check the photograph taken of your vehicle if yous receive a ticket.[33] Singapore too began use of red light cameras in the 1980s,[7] and installed the first camera systems during five years, starting in Baronial 1986.[4] In Canada, by 1998, cherry-red light cameras were in utilise in British Columbia and due to be implemented in Manitoba.[six] In Alberta, blood-red calorie-free cameras were installed in 1999 in Edmonton[34] and in 2001 in Calgary.[35] The Great britain first installed cameras in the 1990s,[seven] with the earliest locations including 8 track crossings in Scotland where at that place was greatest demand for enforcement of traffic signals due to fatalities.[11]

China [edit]

A set of pictures taken by a ruby light camera in Luannan County, People's republic of china, the blackness car in the pictures ran the ruby calorie-free

Scarlet light photographic camera usage is extensive in mainland China. Every bit of 2007[update], approximately 700 intersections in Shenzhen were monitored for scarlet light violations, speeding, or both.[36]

China besides has red calorie-free camera with facial recognition. Red calorie-free offender, either pedestrian or motorbikers, are captured by a 7 megapixel photographic camera. Within 20 minutes, a facial recognition organization identifies personal information including family unit proper noun, ID number and address which are displayed in the street on an advert screen. This data can also be published on social media.[37]

According to the owner, in less than four months, in Lianhua intersection in Shenzhen, jaywalking were reduced from 1000 each day to 80.[37]

Hong Kong [edit]

Hong Kong introduced red low-cal cameras in 1993.[38]

In Hong Kong, where ruby-red light cameras are installed, signs are erected to warn drivers that cameras are present, with the aim of educating drivers to terminate for signals.[39] The number of red light cameras in Hong Kong doubled in May 2004, and digital red light cameras were introduced at intersections identified by the police and transport department as having the most violations and greatest run a risk. The digital cameras were introduced to further deter crimson-light running. Every bit added assistance to drivers, some of the camera posts were painted orange so that drivers could see them more easily.[25] By 2006, Hong Kong had 96 cherry-red light cameras in operation.[40] By 2016 this number had risen to 195.[41]

In Hong-Kong, penalization for the failure to comply with traffic signals is a HK$5,000 fine and three months' jail for a showtime offense. Penalty for other offenses are a HK$x,000 penalty and six-calendar month term.[38]

In Hong-Kong, red light cameras helped reduce violation jumping by 43 to 55%.[38]

France [edit]

In French republic, carmine light cameras started use in 2009. Cameras catch drivers that neglect to terminate on a red light.[42]A removal of 4 points on the driving licence will occur.[43]

New multipurpose camera might, such as the Mesta Fusion 2 have several simultaneous capacity in a single device, such as scarlet light photographic camera, Level crossing red light camera and speed camera.[44] In a most future the might be able to as well catch other infractions such every bit phone usage, failure to wear the seat belt wearing, or failure to maintain prophylactic distance between vehicle.[44]

Some insurance companies recommend to comply with regulation to avert the fine. This implies a speed decrease when budgeted a scarlet low-cal, because it tin can switch to orangish and and then to blood-red, avoiding acceleration when light is orange, using the brake (which turn on braking lite) to communicate to followers the braking activity, and keep the automobile before the red light finish line.[43]

In the south e quarter of France, red low-cal cameras (MESTA 3000) are provided by Safran; their availability charge per unit is 95%, taking into account route works and acts of vandalism. This availability is considered better than the 1 observed in Britain, Kingdom of spain, the netherlands, Switzerland and Germany co-ordinate to a French National Associates report.[45]

Germany [edit]

The starting time red light camera in Germany was operated on November 1960 the 15th at Francfort-sur-le-Main, with black and white photos.

Red light violation toll a 90€ fine, and one betoken removal is registered on the driving license. If ruby-red light violation occurs while the light is reddish for more than than one second, the fine is 200€ with ii points, and driving license is suspended for 1 month. The fine can as well be 320€ in case of immediate danger, or 360€ in case of crash.[46]

The fine for the terminate line violation is just 10€.

United Kingdom [edit]

In the United Kingdom the regime often refer to red-lite cameras, along with speed cameras, as safe cameras.[47] They were first used in the early 1990s,[48] with initial deployment past the Department for Environment, Transport and the Regions. All costs were paid by the local potency in which the individual camera was placed, and revenues accrued from fines were paid to the Treasury Consolidated Fund.[48] In 1998 the authorities handed the powers of collection to local road-rubber partnerships,[49] comprising "... local regime, Magistrates' Courts, the Highways Agency and the constabulary."[49]

In a report, published in December 2005, there were a total of 612 red light cameras in England alone, of which 225 were in London.[50]

In the Great britain, failure to cease for a scarlet light gives an £100 fine and adds iii points on the driving license. Some police forces might too annals motorists caught running a red low-cal to educational courses.[51]

United states of america [edit]

Source: IIHS[52]

Carmine light camera in Chicago, Il.

Since the early on 1990s, red light cameras accept been used in the United States[7] in 26 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.[53] Within some states, the cameras may only be permitted in certain areas. For example, in New York State, the Vehicle and Traffic Law permits red light cameras just within cities with a population above i million (i.e. New York City), Rochester, Buffalo, Yonkers, and Nassau and Suffolk Counties.[54] In Florida, a state law went into effect on ane July 2010, which allows all municipalities in the state to use red light cameras on all state-owned rights-of-way and fine drivers who run ruby lights,[12] with the aim of enforcing safe driving, according to then-Governor Charlie Crist.[55] The proper noun given to the state constabulary is the Mark Wandall Traffic Safety Act, named for a human who was killed in 2003 past a motorist who ran a cherry low-cal.[13] In improver to allowing the use of cameras, the law too standardizes commuter fines.[56] Major cities throughout the U.s.a. that employ blood-red light cameras include Atlanta, Austin, Baltimore, Baton Rouge, Chicago, Dallas, Denver, Los Angeles, Memphis, New Orleans, New York City, Newark, Philadelphia, Phoenix, Raleigh, San Francisco, Seattle, Toledo, and Washington, D.C.[53] Albuquerque has cameras, only in October 2011 local voters approved a ballot measure out advising the urban center quango to stop authorizing the cerise light photographic camera program. The City of Albuquerque concluded its ruby-red light plan on 31 December 2011.[57]

In March 2017, the city of Chicago changed the menstruum of time between when the light turns ruby-red and when the red-calorie-free camera is triggered (and a ticket issued) from 0.1 seconds to 0.three seconds. The "grace period" in Chicago is at present in line with other major American cities like New York City and Philadelphia.[58]

Suppliers of blood-red-light cameras in the U.s.a. include: Affiliated Computer Services (ACS) Land and Local Solutions, a Xerox company, of Dallas, Texas;[59] American Traffic Solutions of Scottsdale, Arizona, one/3 owned by Goldman Sachs;[60] [61] Brekford International Corp., of Hanover, Maryland;[62] CMA Consulting Services, Inc. of Latham, New York;[63] Gatso USA of Beverly, Massachusetts;[64] iTraffic Prophylactic LLC of Ridgeland, Southward Carolina;[65] NovoaGlobal Inc., of Orlando, Florida; Optotraffic, of Lanham, Maryland;[66] Redflex Traffic Systems of Phoenix, Arizona, with its parent visitor in Commonwealth of australia;[67] RedSpeed-Illinois LLC, of Lombard, Illinois, whose parent company is in Worcestershire, England;[68] and SafeSpeed LLC, of Chicago, Illinois.[68]

Some states have chosen to prohibit the use of red light cameras. These include Arkansas, Maine, Michigan, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, Texas (phasing out fully by 2021), and Due west Virginia.[69] [lxx] [71]

In Feb 2012, the red light camera ordinance in the urban center of St. Louis was officially declared void by St. Louis Circuit Court Approximate Mark Neill.[72] On 9 August 2012, the Cary, North Carolina town council voted to end their plan.[73] In February 2013, the San Diego mayor helped remove a red light camera to go along the campaign promise he made during the November 2012 election to eliminate these systems.[74] New Jersey had to renew the Scarlet Low-cal law by the state legislature in early 2015 and did not do this, making the use of blood-red calorie-free cameras illegal in the state afterwards.

In the United States, fines are not standardized and vary to a swell caste, from $50 in New York City[75] to approximately $500 in California.[76] The cost in California tin increase to approximately $600 if the motorist elects to attend traffic school in order to avoid having a demerit point added to his or her driving record.

Observe of traffic violation [edit]

In many California law departments, when a positive identification cannot exist made, the registered owner of the vehicle volition be mailed a notice of traffic violation instead of a real ticket. Also known as "snitch tickets," these notices are used to request identifying information about the driver of the vehicle during the alleged violation. Considering these notices take not been filed at court, they behave no legal weight and the registered owner is nether no obligation to respond. In California, a 18-carat ticket will deport the name and accost of the local branch of the Superior Court and directly the recipient to contact that courtroom. In contrast, a observe of traffic violation generated by the constabulary will omit court data, using statements similar "This is not a discover to announced" and "Practise not forward this information to the Court."[77] [78] [79] [80]

In September 2014, a pecker was proposed in New Jersey to disallow the state Motor Vehicle Commission from sharing license plate and driver data needed to cite New Bailiwick of jersey drivers accused of committing infractions in some other land.[81]

Subtract since 2012 in the Usa [edit]

While the number of red light cameras decreased from 533 in 2012 to 421 in 2018, people killed in red-light crashes increased from 696 in 2012 to 811 in 2016, reflecting a 17% increase.[82]

The reasons for the ruby light camera discontinuation were reduction in camera citations, difficulty sustaining the financial viability of the program and intense community opposition.[52]

In the USA, surveys indicate the public support for red low-cal camera enforcement; nonetheless, the support is decreasing if programs are not adequate, or if perception is focused on revenue rather than on saving lives. To be successful, a red lite photographic camera should focus on safe and transparency, likewise as be located in a problematic intersection which needs to be assessed by communities (for instance, for road design and point timing). It could also accept into account public input with stakeholders such every bit law enforcement, victim advocates, schoolhouse officials and residents to plan a program.[52]

Singapore [edit]

In 2014 Singapore started to utilize German Jenoptik ruby-red low-cal cameras, with an eleven-megapixel resolution. 240 streets have ruby light cameras in Singapore.[83]

New South Wales [edit]

In New South Wales cherry-red lite cameras were introduced in April 1982 [84] followed past speed cameras in 2009.[85]

In New South Wales at that place are 191 cameras at 171 intersection. These camera tin check both the crimson low-cal and the speed[85]

During the period of observations were:

  • 33% reduction in fatal and serious injury crashes
  • 54% reduction in fatalities
  • 35% reduction in serious injuries
  • 49% reduction in pedestrian casualties.[85]

Studies and politics [edit]

A report in 2003 by the National Cooperative Highway Enquiry Program examined studies from the previous xxx years in Australia, the UK, Singapore, and the US, and concluded that red light cameras "improve the overall condom of intersections where they are used."[7] While the report states that evidence is not conclusive (partly due to flaws in the studies), the majority of studies evidence a reduction in angle crashes, a smaller increase in rear-stop crashes, with some show of a "spillover" effect of reduced cherry low-cal running to other intersections within a jurisdiction.[7] These findings are similar to a 2005 meta assay, which compared the results of x controlled before-subsequently studies of red low-cal cameras in the US, Australia, and Singapore. The analysis stated that the studies showed a reduction in crashes (up to almost thirty%) in which in that location were injuries; nevertheless, prove was less conclusive for a reduction in total collisions.[86] Studies of red light cameras worldwide show a reduction of crashes involving injury past about 25% to 30%, taking into account increases in rear-stop crashes, co-ordinate to testimony from a meeting of the Virginia Business firm of Delegates Militia, Police, and Public Condom Committee in 2003.[87] These findings are supported by a review of more than 45 international studies carried out in 2010, which found that reddish low-cal cameras reduce red light violation rates, crashes resulting from crimson low-cal running, and usually reduce correct-angle collisions.[35]

Amongst the many researched prophylactic benefits of installing RLCs, few studies have examined drivers' behavior change in relation to red-light cameras showing that at these intersections drivers tended to react quicker to a yellowish light change when stopping.[xv] [88] The consequence of this change could be the slight refuse in the intersection capacity.[xvi] In terms of location-specific studies, in Singapore a study from 2003 constitute that there was "a substantial drop" in red lite violations at intersections with red low-cal cameras. In particular the written report plant that drivers were encouraged to cease more than readily in areas with red calorie-free cameras in use.[four] A study from civic administrators in Saskatchewan in 2001, when considering ruby light camera use, referred to studies in the Netherlands and Commonwealth of australia that found a 40% decrease in red light violations and 32% decrease in right-angle crashes where red low-cal cameras were installed.[89] Post-obit the introduction of cerise light cameras in Western Australia, the number of serious right-angle crashes decreased by forty%, co-ordinate to an article from the Canberra Times.[21] In an article from the Xinhua General News Service, the Hong Kong transport department reported that in 2006 the monthly average number of crashes due to red light violations barbarous 25% and the number of people injured in these crashes decreased by thirty%, following an increase in the number of red low-cal cameras in use.[forty]

Northward America [edit]

Ruby light photographic camera in Ontario, Canada

In the U.Due south. and Canada, a number of studies accept examined whether cherry-red light cameras produce a safety benefit. A 2005 study by the U.Due south. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) suggests red low-cal cameras reduce unsafe correct-bending crashes.[90] The FHWA study has been criticized as containing critical methodological and analytical flaws and failing to explain an increase in fatalities associated with red light photographic camera use:[91]

(...)the authors spotlight the statistical difficulties of including the toll of fatalities, while ignoring the practical implications of such events (...) assuming that each angle injury crash had a societal toll of $64,468, when in fact the cost was $82,816 before camera use and $100,176 after camera utilise(...)[92]

Non all studies have been favorable to the employ of red lite cameras. A 2004 study of 17,271 crashes from N Carolina A & T University showed that the presence of red light cameras increased the overall number of crashes by 40%.[93] This inquiry received no peer review and is considered flawed by the IIHS.[94] A 2005 Virginia Department of Transportation study of the long-term effects of camera enforcement in the state found a decrease in the number of right-bending crashes with injuries, just an increase in rear-end crashes and an overall increment in the number of crashes causing injuries.[95] In 2007, the department issued an updated study which showed that the overall number of crashes at intersections with red light cameras increased. This report concluded that the conclusion to install reddish light cameras should exist made on an intersection-by-intersection footing as some intersections saw decreases in crashes and injuries that justified the use of red light cameras, while others saw increases in crashes, indicating that the cameras were not suitable in that location.[96] This study, as well, is considered flawed past the IIHS.[97] Aurora, Colorado experienced mixed results with blood-red light cameras; afterwards starting camera enforcement at 4 intersections, crashes decreased past lx% at one, increased 100% at two, and increased 175% at the quaternary.[98] According to the IIHS, most studies suggest the increase in rear-end collisions decreases once drivers have become accustomed to the new dynamics of the intersection.[2] Some locations feel a decrease in rear-end collisions at intersections with ruby-red light cameras over time, for instance, in Los Angeles such collisions fell iv.vii% from 2008 to 2009.[99] Nevertheless, a 2010 assay by the Los Angeles City Controller institute L.A.'s red light cameras hadn't demonstrated an improvement in condom,[100] specifically that of the 32 intersections equipped with cameras, 12 saw more crashes than before the cameras were installed, four had the same number, and 16 had fewer crashes; besides that factors other than the cameras may have been responsible for the reduced crashes at the 16 intersections.[101] And in Winnipeg, Manitoba, crashes were found to have significantly increased in the years following the deployment of red light cameras.[102] In 2010, Arizona completed a study of their statewide 76 photo enforcement cameras[103] and decided they would non renew the programme in 2011; lower revenue than expected, mixed public acceptance and mixed accident data were cited.[104]

Still, the FHWA has ended that the cameras yielded a positive overall cost benefit due to the reduction in more than expensive right-angle injury collisions.[xc] [105] Other studies accept establish a greater crash reduction. For example, a 2005 study of the Raleigh, N Carolina, red light camera plan conducted by the Found for Transportation Research and Pedagogy at North Carolina State University plant correct-angle crashes dropped by 42%, rear-terminate crashes dropped by 25% and full crashes dropped past 17%.[106] In 2010, the IIHS looked at results of a number of studies and institute that ruby-red lite cameras reduce total collisions and particularly reduce the type of crashes that are especially likely to cause injuries.[107] A 2011 IIHS report concluded that the rate of fatal collisions involving cerise-light running in cities with a population of 200,000 or greater was 24% lower with cameras than it would have been without cameras.[108]

Opinions [edit]

The states [edit]

A 2009 Public Stance Strategies poll which asked, "Practise yous support or oppose the apply of cerise-lite cameras to detect red-light runners and enforce traffic laws in your country'due south most dangerous intersections?" establish 69% support and 29% oppose.[109] A 2012 telephone survey of District of Columbia residents published in the journal Traffic Injury Prevention institute that 87% favored ruby-red light cameras.[110]

The National Motorists Association opposes cherry-red light cameras on the grounds that the use of these devices raises legal problems and violates the privacy of citizens. They also fence that the use of red low-cal cameras does not increment safety.[14] In the United states of america, AAA Auto Guild South argued against the passage of a Florida state constabulary to allow red light cameras, stating that use of red calorie-free cameras was primarily for raising money for the state and local government coffers and would not increment road safety.[thirteen] [111] Worse, in that location are allegations of corruption in shortening the amber to increase the number of tickets.[112] The construction of speed breakers or road bumps were conventional methods of forcing motorists to lower speeds, simply were dropped at locales in favor of cameras due to lobbying efforts.

Canada and Europe [edit]

In Norway, Kingdom of spain, and the netherlands, a postal survey in 2003 showed credence of the apply of red calorie-free cameras for traffic enforcement.[four] For some groups, the enforcement of traffic laws is considered the master reason for using the ruby-red lite cameras. For example, a report from borough administrators in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada in 2001 described the cameras as "simply an enforcement tool used to penalize motorists that fail to cease for ruby-red traffic signals."[89]

Legal questions and restrictions [edit]

U.s. [edit]

Equally of December 2016[update] Arizona, Arkansas, Louisiana, Maine, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, Due south Carolina, Southward Dakota, Utah, West Virginia, and Wisconsin take enacted various prohibitions on scarlet light, speed or other photo enforcement camera uses.[113] [114] Texas banned the utilize of ruddy cameras in 2019.[115] Restrictions or conditions be in boosted states; the New Mexico Department of Transportation, for example, has asserted the correct to restrict or prohibit cerise light cameras on state highways.[116] While red lite cameras may non be prohibited in other regions, they may have some restrictions on their utilize. In some jurisdictions, the law says that the photographic camera needs to obtain a photo of the commuter'south face in order for the citation issued for running the red low-cal to exist valid. This is the case in California and Colorado[69] where the scarlet lite cameras are fix up to take a serial of photographs, including one of the driver'due south face.[117] In California, state law assesses a demerit point against a driver who runs a red calorie-free,[118] and the need to identify the actual violator has led to the creation of a unique investigatory tool, the fake "ticket."[77] [78] [79] [lxxx] Groups opposing the utilize of red light cameras have argued that where the cameras are non set up to identify the vehicle driver, possessor liability issues are raised. Information technology is perceived by some that the owner of the vehicle is unfairly penalized by being considered liable for scarlet-light violations although they may not have been the commuter at the time of the crime.[6] [119] In most jurisdictions the liability for cherry light violations is a civil offense, rather than a criminal citation, issued upon the vehicle possessor—like to a parking ticket.[120] The issue of possessor liability has been addressed in the Usa courts, with a ruling in the District of Columbia Court of Appeals in 2007, which agreed with a lower court when it constitute that the presumption of liability of the owners of vehicles issued citations does not violate due process rights.[121] This ruling was supported past a 2009 7th US Circuit Court of Appeals ruling in which it was held that issuing citations to vehicle owners (or lessees) is constitutional. The courtroom stated that information technology as well encourages drivers to be cautious in lending their vehicles to others.[122]

The statement that red lite cameras violate the privacy of citizens,[fourteen] has also been addressed in the US courts. Co-ordinate to a 2009 ruling past the 7th The states Excursion Court of Appeals, "no 1 has a fundamental correct to run a ruby-red calorie-free or avert being seen by a camera on a public street."[123] In addition, cameras only take photographs or video when a vehicle has run a cerise light and, in near states, the camera does not photograph the driver or the occupants of the vehicle.[2] It is as well argued that such cameras violate the Sixth Amendment's Confrontation Clause and the right to be assumed innocent until proven guilty.[124]

In most areas, cerise light enforcement cameras are installed and maintained by private firms.[125] [126] [127] Lawsuits have been raised challenging individual companies' rights to manus out citations, such as a December 2008 lawsuit challenging the city of Dallas' carmine lite photographic camera program, which was dismissed in March 2009.[128] In well-nigh cases, citations are issued by law enforcement officers using the evidence provided by the companies.[127]

In that location have been many instances where cities in the United states take been establish to take as well-short yellowish-lite intervals at some intersections where cerise light cameras have been installed. In Tennessee, 176 drivers were refunded for fines paid later on it was discovered that the length of the yellow was too short for that location, and motorists were caught running the lite in the starting time 2d of the red stage.[129] In California, a combined total of 7,603 tickets were refunded or dismissed by the cities of Bakersfield, Costa Mesa, East LA, San Carlos, and Union Urban center, because of too-short yellows.[130] Although national guidelines addressing the length of traffic signals are available,[131] traffic bespeak stage times are determined by the government employees of the metropolis, county or state for that signalized location.[132] [133] While some states set jurisdiction-wide abiding durations for yellow-low-cal intervals, a new standard is taking hold. States are required to prefer the 2009 National Manual on Compatible Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) as their legal state standard for traffic-command devices since 2011.[131] These standards crave engineering practices to be used to set yellowish-light-timing durations at private intersections and or corridors.[134] For guidance to state authorities, MUTCD states yellow lights should have a minimum duration of 3 seconds and a maximum duration of 6 seconds.[135] The deadline for compliance is 2014.[134] In the US, if any role of a driver's vehicle has already passed into the intersection when the signal turns red, a violation is non generated. A ticket is only issued if the vehicle enters the intersection while the calorie-free is red.[10] [136]

In 2014, a bill was introduced in the United states House of Representatives attempting to prohibit red light cameras on federally funded highways and in the Commune of Columbia.[137]

Italian republic [edit]

In 2010, it was revealed that the municipality of Segrate, Italy, two nearby traffic lights had been synchronized such that drivers were coerced to either break the speed limit or pass during the cherry-red lite. This was investigated as a deliberate fraud to increase the income from tickets. It took months before the machines were eventually dismantled by the Guardia di Finanza.[138]

Alternatives [edit]

A blood-red light camera is not the but countermeasure confronting red-light running. Others include increasing the visibility distance and conspicuity of the traffic light so it is more likely to attract the commuter'southward attending in time for him or her to end,[139] [140] re-timing lights so drivers will encounter fewer cherry ones,[139] [141] increasing the duration of the yellow light between the green and the red,[142] [143] adding a "clearance" phase to the intersection's traffic signals, during which all directions accept a reddish light.[140] It has been posited that the regulatory minimum yellow duration has been decreased over the years, that this is a cause of the increase in crimson-low-cal running, and that the latter countermeasures amount to a reversion to earlier, longer regulated yellow-low-cal durations.[144]

See besides [edit]

  • Speed bump (Sleeping policeman)
  • Divided highway

References [edit]

  1. ^ "Traffic Infraction Detectors (RLRC)". Florida Department of Transportation . Retrieved 2021-04-07 .
  2. ^ a b c d "Q&As: Carmine light cameras". Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. Dec 2010. Retrieved sixteen December 2010.
  3. ^ a b c d Retting, Richard A.; Ferguson, Susan A.; Hakkert, A. Shalom (2003). "Effects of Red Light Cameras on Violations and Crashes: A Review of the International Literature". Traffic Injury Prevention. four (1): 17–23. doi:x.1080/15389580309858. PMID 14522657.
  4. ^ a b c d G M Lum; Y D Wong (March 2003). "A before-and-after study on red light camera installation". ITE Journal. Plant of Transportation Engineers. 73 (3): 28–32. ISSN 0162-8178.
  5. ^ a b "Priority, Marketplace-Ready Technologies and Innovations, Red Light Cameras". FHWA.gov. Archived from the original on 2011-04-20. Retrieved 22 March 2011.
  6. ^ a b c d Jason Small (eighteen August 1998). "Halton adds vox to call for carmine-low-cal camera traps". The Hamilton Spectator. Ontario, Canada. p. N3.
  7. ^ a b c d east f g National Cooperative Highway Enquiry Program (2003). "Touch on of Red Light Camera Enforcement on Crash Experience" (PDF). Transportation Research Board . Retrieved 17 December 2010.
  8. ^ "Red calorie-free cameras: a Drivers.com overview of the issue". Drivers.com. Retrieved 2020-02-24 .
  9. ^ Retting, Richard A.; Ferguson, Susan A.; Hakkert, A. Shalom (2003). "Effects of Red Light Cameras on Violations and Crashes: A Review of the International Literature". Traffic Injury Prevention. 4: 17–23. doi:10.1080/15389580309858. PMID 14522657.
  10. ^ a b c d e "Red Light Photograph Rubber Programme: Frequently Asked Questions". SanDiego.gov. Archived from the original on 6 Nov 2010. Retrieved 16 December 2010.
  11. ^ a b Alastair Dalton (8 November 2004). "Crossings Pose the Biggest Rail Threat". The Scotsman. Scotland. p. iv.
  12. ^ a b Beth Burger (one July 2010). "v-twelvemonth crusade concludes with cherry light constabulary". Bradenton Herald . Retrieved 25 March 2019.
  13. ^ a b c "Crist signs Fla. bill legalizing red calorie-free cameras". NaplesNews.com. 13 May 2010. Retrieved 7 January 2011.
  14. ^ a b c "NMA Objections To Ruby Light Cameras". National Motorists Association. Archived from the original on 26 May 2011. Retrieved nine Jan 2011.
  15. ^ a b Fatemeh Baratian-Ghorghi; Huaguo Zhou; Isaac Wasilefsky (2015). "Impacts of Red Light Photo Enforcement Cameras on Clearance Lost Time at Signalized Intersections". Transportation Research Board . Retrieved 17 June 2015.
  16. ^ a b Baratian-Ghorghi, Fatemeh; Zhou, Huaguo; Wasilefsky, Isaac (2015). "Effect of Ruby-red-Light Cameras on Capacity of Signalized Intersections". Journal of Transportation Engineering. 142: 04015035. doi:x.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000804.
  17. ^ Cohn, Ellen G.; Kakar, Suman; Perkins, Chloe; Steinbach, Rebecca; Edwards, Phil (2020). "Ruby-red calorie-free camera interventions for reducing traffic violations and traffic crashes: A systematic review". Campbell Systematic Reviews. 16 (ii). doi:x.1002/cl2.1091.
  18. ^ Ceccarelli, Brian; Shovlin, Joseph. "Does the Multibillion-Dollar Scarlet Low-cal Photographic camera Sector Owe Its Beingness - and Profits - to Traffic Engineers' Misapplication of the Yellow Modify Interval Formula?". Traffic Engineering science International, October/Nov 2013 pp. 56-62. An additional issue is that many carmine lite cameras utilize compressed video, making it incommunicable for the ticket holder to prove they were within the "dilemma zone". A dilemma zone is the expanse where a driver finds information technology is impossible to either stop in time or proceed through the intersection earlier the calorie-free turns red.
  19. ^ a b c "History". Gatso.com. Archived from the original on 2011-05-19. Retrieved nine January 2011.
  20. ^ Row, Heath (July 1996). "Ruddy Lite Commune". CIO Magazine. p. 116. Retrieved 22 March 2011.
  21. ^ a b c Peter Clack (26 November 2000). "World-Commencement Digital Camera to Nab Red Light Runners". The Canberra Times. Canberra, Australia. p. 7.
  22. ^ Jane Larson (18 January 2008). "Non-Cease Growth". The Arizona Republic. Archived from the original on 17 January 2013.
  23. ^ "Traffic Solutions Brochure" (PDF). Jenoptik.com. Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 Feb 2018. Retrieved 17 Jan 2011.
  24. ^ "Focus On Safety" (PDF). Stop Reddish Lite Running. 2007. p. 51 and 53. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-09-06. Retrieved nine January 2011.
  25. ^ a b c d Peter Michael; Felix Lo (nineteen May 2004). "Ruby lite cameras click into activity; The 12 new digital devices are part of a police crackdown on unsafe driving". S Prc Forenoon Post. Hong Kong. p. 3.
  26. ^ Kriz, Karyn; Moran, Christian; Regan, Molly (Jump 2006). "An Analysis of a Reddish-Light Camera Plan in the Urban center of Milwaukee" (PDF). Lafollette.Wisc.edu. University of Wisconsin-Madison. p. five. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-09-27. Retrieved 22 March 2011.
  27. ^ "Frequently Asked Questions, No. 27". highwayrobbery.internet. Retrieved 18 November 2011.
  28. ^ "Frequently Asked Questions". American Traffic Solutions, Inc. Archived from the original on 2011-11-26. Retrieved 18 November 2011.
  29. ^ "Frequently Asked Questions, No. 36". highwayrobbery.net. Retrieved 18 November 2011.
  30. ^ "Red Light Cameras FAQ". Toronto.ca. Retrieved 19 Dec 2010.
  31. ^ Clay Lucas (x July 2009). "How low tin can nosotros go?". The Age. Melbourne, Commonwealth of australia. p. 9.
  32. ^ Matt Johnston (21 July 2010). "Dozens of new speed and red calorie-free cameras to go live in Victoria". Herald Sun . Retrieved 17 Dec 2010.
  33. ^ "See your blood-red light, speed camera photo". The Daily Telegraph. Sydney, Australia. 2 September 2008. Retrieved nineteen December 2010.
  34. ^ "Intersection Prophylactic Cameras". Edmonton Police Service. Archived from the original on 2011-03-thirteen. Retrieved 22 March 2011.
  35. ^ a b Bochner, B.; Walden, T (2010). "Effectiveness of Cherry-red Light Cameras". ITE Journal (May): 23. Retrieved 16 December 2010.
  36. ^ He, Jie; King, Marking; Watson, Barry; Rakotonirainy, Andry; Fleiter, Judy (January 2013). "Speed enforcement in China: National, provincial and city initiatives and their success". Accident Assay & Prevention. 50: 282–8. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2012.04.017. PMID 22579218.
  37. ^ a b "Cathay Is Using Facial Recognition To Catch Jaywalkers". Outriders. 2018-10-25.
  38. ^ a b c "With traffic deaths on the rise, Hong Kong gets 40 new ruby-red light cameras". 2016-03-16.
  39. ^ Brendan Delfino (27 September 1996). "Warning for red calorie-free jumpers". The South China Morn Post. Hong Kong. p. viii.
  40. ^ a b "Red lite jumping accidents fall in Hong Kong". Xinhua Full general News Service. 23 December 2006.
  41. ^ "New red light cameras in functioning today". Hong Kong Government. sixteen March 2016.
  42. ^ "Passage à fifty'orangish et radar feu rouge : quel risque ?". Stages Points Permis (in French).
  43. ^ a b "Infographie – Fonctionnement du radar feu rouge et risque". Mutuelle Assurance MMA (in French).
  44. ^ a b "Radars multifonctions : ils débarquent en strength sur les routes en 2019". Autoplus.fr (in French). 2019-04-03.
  45. ^ "Enforcement suppliers highlight industry best practice".
  46. ^ "Rote Ampel überfahren". bussgeldkatalog.org (in German). 2013-10-10.
  47. ^ Department for Transport (31 Jan 2007). "Indicate viii" (PDF). Use of Speed and Red-Light Cameras for Traffic Enforcement: Guidance on Deployment, Visibility and Signing (DfT Circular 01/2007 ed.). Department for Transport. p. two. ISBN978-0-eleven-552834-seven. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-06-fourteen. Retrieved 28 June 2011.
  48. ^ a b Adrian Gains; Michael Nordstrom; Benjamin Heydecker; John Shrewsbury. (December 2005). The national safety camera plan Four-year evaluation study (PDF). PA Consulting Grouping and CTS at UCL (University College London). p. three. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-06-17. Retrieved 28 June 2011.
  49. ^ a b Adrian Gains; Michael Nordstrom; Benjamin Heydecker; John Shrewsbury. (December 2005). The national safety photographic camera programme Four-year evaluation report (PDF). PA Consulting Group and CTS at UCL (Academy College London). p. 4. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-06-17. Retrieved 28 June 2011.
  50. ^ Adrian Gains; Michael Nordstrom; Benjamin Heydecker; John Shrewsbury. (December 2005). The national safety photographic camera programme 4-year evaluation report (PDF). PA Consulting Group and CTS at UCL (University College London). p. 113. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-06-17. Retrieved 28 June 2011.
  51. ^ "Traffic light cameras: what yous demand to know". rac.co.great britain.
  52. ^ a b c "New guidelines for automated enforcement programs emphasize condom amid rise in red-light-running crash deaths". IIHS-HLDI crash testing and highway safety. 2018-07-24.
  53. ^ a b "Communities using red light and/or speed cameras". Insurance Establish for Highway Rubber. Dec 2010. Retrieved 20 Dec 2010.
  54. ^ "NYS Associates printing release: Assembly Authorizes Scarlet Calorie-free Cameras in Nassau and Suffolk Counties, Buffalo, Rochester and Yonkers". Retrieved 20 September 2013.
  55. ^ Sterling Ivey (13 May 2010). "Memorandum:Governor Crist Signs Legislation Creating the Marking Wandall Traffic Prophylactic Human activity" (PDF). The Mark Wandall Foundation. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2010-xi-sixteen. Retrieved 7 January 2011.
  56. ^ Melissa Wandall (11 April 2009). "Florida'southward deadly intersections took my husband". The Gainesville Sun . Retrieved vii January 2011.
  57. ^ "Albuquerque Voters Decline Cherry Lite Cameras". thenewspaper.com. five Oct 2011. Retrieved 18 Nov 2011.
  58. ^ Farivar, Cyrus (2017-03-22). "Red-calorie-free camera grace period goes from 0.1 to 0.3 seconds, Chicago to lose $17M". Ars Technica . Retrieved 2017-03-23 .
  59. ^ Carl Mario Nudi (23 July 2009). "Keeping an centre on red lite runners". The Bradenton Herald. Archived from the original on 2010-12-05. Retrieved 16 January 2011.
  60. ^ "Frequently Asked Questions, No. 34". highwayrobbery.net. Retrieved 18 November 2011.
  61. ^ "New York Voters Express Strong Support for Blood-red Lite Cameras" (Press release). American Traffic Solutions. ane October 2009. Retrieved 25 March 2019.
  62. ^ "Brekford Corp. Expands into Traffic Photo Enforcement Manufacture" (PDF) (Press release). Brekford International Corp. 1 Apr 2010. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-03-26. Retrieved 3 June 2011.
  63. ^ Joseph Spector (sixteen June 2008). "N.Y. red-lite cameras may depend on lobbyist connections". The states Today . Retrieved 19 January 2011.
  64. ^ "Streamwood OKs red-light cameras for intersection" (PDF). Gatso-USA.com. 18 July 2008. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-03-26. Retrieved three June 2011.
  65. ^ Paul Tharp (6 September 2010). "Ridgeland Mayor Gary Due west. Hodges: Photo-cop is new rubber tool, not coin automobile". South Carolina Lawyers Weekly.
  66. ^ David Hill (9 December 2010). "Ticketing accelerates in College Park". The Washington Postal service. p. T18.
  67. ^ Scott Broden (fifteen January 2011). "Bids on ruby-light cameras rejected". The Daily News Journal. Murfreesboro, TN.
  68. ^ a b Joseph Ruzich (24 September 2009). "Camera firm with by ties to lawyer wins pact". Chicago Tribune. p. 23.
  69. ^ a b "Automatic enforcement laws". Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. March 2011. Retrieved 22 March 2011.
  70. ^ Hruska, Joel (24 March 2009). "Mississippi makes red light cameras illegal". Retrieved 2009-04-28 .
  71. ^ "An Informal Presentation to the House Transportation Commission on Blood-red Light Cameras, November 30, 2011" (PDF). thirty November 2011. Retrieved 2013-06-17 .
  72. ^ "St. Louis' Cerise-Light Camera Ordinance Officially Declared Void". Riverfront Times. Archived from the original on 2012-04-xv. Retrieved 2012-04-01 .
  73. ^ "Cary axes blood-red-calorie-free cameras". News & Observer. ten August 2012. Retrieved 2012-08-11 .
  74. ^ "San Diego drops red-low-cal cameras". The San Diego Union-Tribune. one February 2013.
  75. ^ "Hearing on the Financial 2010 Executive Budget" (PDF). Council of the Metropolis of New York, Finance Dept. 13 May 2009. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-09-eleven. Retrieved 20 Nov 2011.
  76. ^ "Uniform Bond and Penalization Schedule" (PDF). Judicial Quango of California. July 2011. Retrieved 20 November 2011.
  77. ^ a b "Red Low-cal Cameras in California". Highwayrobbery.net. Retrieved 2020-02-24 .
  78. ^ a b Goldstein, David (2011-02-13). "Are Law Tricking People Into Paying 'Snitch' Tickets?". CBS Los Angeles.
  79. ^ a b "The Right To Remain Silent". almanacnews.com. 8 November 2011. Retrieved 18 Nov 2011.
  80. ^ a b "Something Every Consumer Should Know". HandelontheLaw.com. 27 March 2009. Archived from the original on 2012-12-04. Retrieved xviii November 2011.
  81. ^ "Neb A3527". Country of New Jersey. Retrieved 19 September 2014.
  82. ^ "Red-Calorie-free-Running Fatalities Increment 17% in Four Years". Automotive Fleet. July 24, 2018.
  83. ^ "five Unlike Types of Traffic Cameras in Singapore". ETHOZ. 2019-04-04.
  84. ^ Hulscher, Frank (1993). A Signal Career. Sydney: Roads and Traffic Potency. p. 133.
  85. ^ a b c "Speed Photographic camera Programs: 2017 Annual Review" (PDF). roadsafety.transport.nsw.gov.au. May 2018.
  86. ^ A. Aeron-Thomas; S. Hess (2005). "Scarlet calorie-free cameras for the prevention of road traffic crashes". Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2): CD003862. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003862.pub2. PMC6492462. PMID 15846684. Retrieved 9 January 2011.
  87. ^ Stephen Oesch (17 January 2003). "Statement before the Virginia Firm of Delegates Militia, law, and Public Safety Committee. Red Light Violations and Red Calorie-free Cameras" (PDF). Insurance Institute for Highway Condom. p. 3. Retrieved 16 December 2010. the trunk of evidence indicates that red light cameras are beneficial. They reduce injury crashes past about 25 to 30 percentage, and that's after accounting for some small increase in rear-stop crashes.
  88. ^ Timothy Jordan Gates; Peter Tarmo Savolainen; Love-Um Maria (2014). "Impacts of Automated Red Low-cal Running Enforcement Cameras on Driver Beliefs". Transportation Enquiry Board . Retrieved 17 June 2015.
  89. ^ a b "Camera logic failed to click". The Star Phoenix. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. 26 January 2001. p. A14.
  90. ^ a b Forrest M. Council (April 2005). "Safety Evaluation of Red Light Cameras". Federal Highway Administration . Retrieved v May 2015.
  91. ^ Langland-Orban, Barbara; Large, John T.; Pracht, Etienne East. (2011). "An Update on Red Light Camera Inquiry: The Need for Federal Standards in the Involvement of Public Rubber" (PDF). Florida Public Wellness Review. viii: one–9. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-07-20. Retrieved 2011-03-05 .
  92. ^ Langland-Orban, Barbara; Pracht, Etienne Eastward.; Large, John T. (2008). "Ruby-red Light Running Cameras: Would Crashes, Injuries and Automobile Insurance Rates Increase If They Are Used in Florida?" (PDF). Florida Public Health Review. 5: ane–7.
  93. ^ "A Detailed Investigation of Crash Take chances Reduction Resulting From Red-Light Cameras in Small Urban Areas". Archived from the original on 2011-01-03. Retrieved 2011-03-13 .
  94. ^ "Highway safety topics" (PDF).
  95. ^ Saeed Eslambolchi; Rahul Khandelwal; Kimberly Thou Mattingly; Kristin W Sprinkle; Patrick Wachendorf; Nicholas J. Garber; John S. Miller (2005). "An evaluation of carmine light camera (photo-carmine) enforcement programs in Virginia: a study in response to a request by Virginia'south Secretary of Transportation". Virginia.gov. Retrieved ix January 2011.
  96. ^ Elizabeth Abel Kassebaum; Saeed Eslambolchi; Santhosh K Korukonda; Nicholas J. Garber; John S. Miller (2007). "The impact of red light cameras (photo-red enforcement) on crashes in Virginia". Virginia.gov. Retrieved 9 January 2011.
  97. ^ Persaud, Bhagwant North.; Richard A. Retting; Craig Lyon; Anne T. McCartt (May 2008). "Review of "The Impact of Red Low-cal Cameras (Photograph-Blood-red Enforcement) on Crashes in Virginia" by Nicholas J. Garber, John South. Miller, R. Elizabeth Abel, Saeed Eslambolchi, and Santhosh K. Korukonda" (PDF). Insurance Plant of Highway Rubber. p. i. Retrieved 17 January 2011.
  98. ^ Washington, Apr M. (26 March 2008). "Aurora may add together cameras to catch red light runners". Rocky Mountain News. Archived from the original on 2008-05-28. Retrieved 2011-03-05 .
  99. ^ "Intradepartmental correspondence." (PDF), Los Angeles Constabulary Department, xvi February 2011, retrieved 2 June 2011
  100. ^ Dennis Romero. "Red Light Cameras in L.A. Could Get Extinct After Urban center Quango Declines to Save Them". L.A. Weekly.
  101. ^ "Inspect of the Photograph Red Lite Plan" (PDF), Los Angeles Role of the City Controller, archived from the original (PDF) on 2010-10-08, retrieved 2011-06-29
  102. ^ Tom Brodbeck. "Cherry-red-light cam disgrace". Winnipeg Sun.
  103. ^ "Department of Public Safety – Photo Enforcement Program: Questions and Answers. Report 10-02" (PDF). State of Arizona, Office of the Accountant General. Jan 2010. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2010-07-16. Retrieved 2010-08-08 .
  104. ^ "Release to Australian Securities Exchange: Arizona Speed Contract" (PDF). Redflex Holdings Limited. vi May 2010. Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 September 2010. Retrieved 2010-08-08 .
  105. ^ "Rubber Evaluation of Red Light Cameras" (PDF). Federal Highway Administration. Apr 2005. Retrieved 16 December 2010.
  106. ^ Lawrence Eastward. Decina; Libby Thomas; Raghavan Srinivasan; Loren Staplin (September 2007). "Automated Enforcement: A Compendium of Worldwide Evaluations of Results" (PDF). nhtsa.gov. p. 33. Retrieved 9 Jan 2011.
  107. ^ Retting, Richard (November 2010). "Two Decades of Photograph Enforcement in the United States: A Brief Summary of Experience and Lessons Learned". ITE Journal.
  108. ^ Hu, Wen; McCartt, Anne T.; Teoh, Eric R. (February 2011). "Furnishings of Red Light Camera Enforcement on Fatal Crashes in Large U.s.a. Cities" (PDF). Periodical of Rubber Research. IIHS.org. 42 (4): 277–82. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2011.06.002. PMID 22017830. Retrieved 22 March 2011.
  109. ^ Neil Newhouse (xix May 2009). "Poll Shows Strong National Support For 'Red Calorie-free Cameras'". TQIA Blog. Public Stance Strategies. Retrieved 16 December 2010.
  110. ^ Cicchino, Jessica B.; Wells, Joann K.; McCartt, Anne T. (2014). "Survey about pedestrian safe and attitudes toward automatic traffic enforcement in Washington, D.C". Traffic Injury Prevention. fifteen (iv): 414–423. doi:10.1080/15389588.2013.830212. ISSN 1538-957X. PMID 24471367. S2CID 26686028.
  111. ^ Jones, James A. (11 May 2010). "AAA seeking veto on ruby-red light cameras". Bradenton Herald . Retrieved 3 June 2011.
  112. ^ Jaffe, Eric (14 August 2015). "Why Red Calorie-free Cameras Accept Big Safety Benefits Just Little Back up". Citylab . Retrieved 17 August 2015.
  113. ^ "States using red light and speed cameras". world wide web.iihs.org . Retrieved 2016-12-22 .
  114. ^ "Traffic and Red Light Camera Laws past State". Findlaw . Retrieved 2019-08-22 .
  115. ^ Fedschun, Travis (2019-06-02). "Red light cameras banned in Texas". Play a trick on News.
  116. ^ "State Transportation Commission Bans Use of Red-light Cameras on State and Federal Highways" (PDF) (Printing release). New Mexico Department of Transportation. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-09-29. Retrieved 2011-05-06 .
  117. ^ "How does it work?". DalyCity.org. Archived from the original on 2011-01-21. Retrieved 19 December 2010.
  118. ^ "Focus On Safety" (PDF). Stop Cherry Calorie-free Running. 2007. p. 66. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-09-06. Retrieved 9 January 2011.
  119. ^ "NMA Objections To Blood-red-Low-cal Cameras". National Motorists Clan. Archived from the original on 18 July 2010. Retrieved 20 December 2010.
  120. ^ "Focus On Safety" (PDF). End Red Light Running. 2007. p. 67. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-09-06. Retrieved 9 January 2011.
  121. ^ Agomo v. Fenty , 916 181 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals 1 February 2007) (""Appellants argue that the method of assessing liability preliminarily to the registered possessor of the auto conflicts with the statutory framework set forth in D.C.Lawmaking § 50-2302.06(a), which requires that the District bear witness a moving violation by clear and convincing evidence, and that this "presumption of liability" violates their due process rights. ... We hold that in that location exists no constitutional violation as asserted and assert."").
  122. ^ Idris v. City of Chicago, Illinois , 08-1363 (7th U.Due south. Circuit Court of Appeals 5 Jan 2009) (""Fining a machine'southward owner is rational for the same reasons:  Owners will have more care when lending their cars, and oftentimes they can pass the expense on to the real wrongdoer." "It is plenty to say that photographs are at least as reliable equally live testimony, that the due process clause allows administrative decisions to be made on newspaper (or photographic) records without regard to the hearsay rule, see Richardson five. Perales, 402 U.South. 389, 91 S.Ct. 1420, 28 Fifty.Ed.2d 842 (1971), and that the procedures Chicago uses are functionally identical to those it uses to adjudicate parking tickets, a system sustained in Van Harken v. Chicago, 103 F.3d 1346 (7th Cir.1997). Affirmed."").
  123. ^ Idris five. City of Chicago, Illinois , 08-1363 (7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals v January 2009) ("no one has a fundamental right to run a cerise light or avoid being seen by a photographic camera on a public street.").
  124. ^ Allott, Daniel (2019-08-18). "Red-low-cal cameras undermine rule of constabulary". TheHill . Retrieved 2019-08-22 .
  125. ^ Jonathan Miller (6 January 2005). "With Cameras on the Corner, Your Ticket Is in the Mail". The New York Times . Retrieved vii January 2011.
  126. ^ "Toss your ticket". The Washington Times. 1 July 2009. Retrieved 7 January 2011.
  127. ^ a b Josh Farley (3 February 2008). "Grinning, Bremerton! You're on Red Lite Photographic camera". Kitap Sun.com . Retrieved ix January 2011.
  128. ^ "Red Calorie-free Camera Safety Program Frequently Asked Questions". Dallas Metropolis Hall. Archived from the original on 2010-xi-26. Retrieved nine Jan 2011.
  129. ^ Brian Lazenby (13 March 2008). "Quick lite leads to refunds for 176 drivers". Chattanooga Times Free Press. Archived from the original on 2011-01-10. Retrieved seven Jan 2011.
  130. ^ "Camera Towns". highwayrobbery.net. Retrieved 18 November 2011.
  131. ^ a b "Transmission on Uniform Traffic Control Devices". Federal Highway Administration . Retrieved 9 Jan 2011.
  132. ^ "Urban center of Lincoln Traffic Signals Often Asked Questions". Lincoln.ne.gov. Urban center of Lincoln, Nebraska. Retrieved 17 January 2011. The City of Lincoln follows City policies and Nebraska Land Constabulary, which requires u.s.a. to follow the national guidelines outlined in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD)
  133. ^ "Traffic Betoken Coordination Handbook". Housatonic Valley Council of Elected Officials. HVCEO Transportation Planning. Retrieved 17 January 2011.
  134. ^ a b "Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) Compliance Dates". Federal Register. 30 November 2010. Retrieved xiv June 2011.
  135. ^ "Transmission on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) 2009 Edition" (PDF). Federal Highway Assistants. 2009. p. 489. Retrieved fourteen June 2011.
  136. ^ "Photo Enforcement Frequently Asked Questions" (PDF). City of Tucson, Tucson Police Department. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-05-16. Retrieved iii June 2011.
  137. ^ H.R. 5755
  138. ^ "Italy: Prosecution Advances in Red Light Camera Fraud Scandal". theNewspaper.com. 3 May 2010. Retrieved 2011-03-01 . Mayor Adriano Alessandrini is now accused of shortening the elapsing of yellow lights to boost the profits of the red light photographic camera program. The move paid off, with 2,425,801.sixty euros (US $3,206,078.01) in revenue generated from motorists who did not have adequate time to finish, according to prosecution documents.
  139. ^ a b "City of Albuquerque Blood-red Light Camera Report Final Report". UNM.edu. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2010-11-13.
  140. ^ a b "AAA Michigan Program Prevents Crashes, Ane Intersection at a Time" (PDF). motorists.org. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-09-27.
  141. ^ "Alternatives to Red Light Cameras". Archived from the original on 2011-05-26. Retrieved 2011-06-29 .
  142. ^ "Development of Guidelines for Identifying and Treating Locations with a Cerise-Light-Running Problem" (PDF), tamu.edu.
  143. ^ "Yellow Light Timing Myths". Archived from the original on 2011-08-xi. Retrieved 2011-06-29 .
  144. ^ "The Crimson Light Running Crisis: Is it Intentional? Part five". TheNewspaper.com.

External links [edit]

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_light_camera

Posted by: hernandezouldives.blogspot.com

0 Response to "How Do Camera Traps Produce Data"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel