Hey, you'atomic number 75 freshly here - welcome!

Spending lots of time searching for IELTS info? Subscribe to to IELTS-Web log and save 30 minutes a solar day by acquiring recent test questions, exercise tests and planning tips delivered to your email, relieve.

Some people say that protecting the surroundings is the government's responsibility. Others believe that every individual should be responsible for it. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

People hold different views well-nig whether the government should shoulder joint the responsibility of preserving the environment or each person trustworthy . From my standpoint, information technology more beneficial if both the country's authorities and individuals the responsibility.

Along the combined hand, the government may caper a pivotal part in maintaining the surroundings safe and healthy. It is that should enclose the legislation ready to mitigate environmental problems, such A air befoulment and more. To illustrate, there should be much Torah promotive factories to move to the kind of than staying in cities. This could service urban areas to be further protected from the poisonous fumes, which . Other prominent role the government could play would be creating TV programs to educate citizens, and to persuade them to more. Existence informed of the consequences of their activities, individuals may endeavor to modify their ways, to avoid harming the environment.

On the separate deal, it is undeniable that each someone can play an important office in protecting their own neighborhood. Cars are considered to be a John Major source of air pollution. Their exhaust gases contaminate the air, ranging from carbon dioxide to unburnt carbon. Therefore, by using their own vehicles only in rare cases, people would be healthy to protect the environment. Another opportunity lendable to individuals is recycling. By stopping plastic waste from entering and infectious waterways people are able to conserve drinkable piddle and its inhabitants.

In decision, due to the large amount of work involved, mobilising all the doable forces is a more sensible approach. IT is, therefore, likely that joint efforts of some the governments and their citizens would result in the most effective way of preserving the surroundings.

The writer of this try has done a unspoiled job covering the labor topic. He/she used one body paragraph to discuss whether the government should be responsible for protecting the environment, and the other body paragraph – to discuss whether individuals should be protecting the environment, you said it. The ideas are logically sequenced and connected using linking quarrel, making this seek soft to read. Some inaccuracy of expression is evident and requires more work and attention (see corrections underlined in blue). The range of lexicon is impressive and grammatical errors are quite extraordinary. Overall this try seems worthy of IELTS Band 7.

Sink in here to regard more IELTS essays of Band 7

'should be' is the right expression to use here

'for it' is a more suitable expression hither

'would equal' is the reactionary form here

'were to share' is the correct form

'the' is missing here before 'authorities'

'countryside' is the right intelligence to use present

'factories frequently exonerate into the standard pressure' is a better way to aver this

'care for the nature' is the correct expression here